Many people think so. They are wrong.
I wonder if the insurance company would correct such an incorrect perception of the law. OK, you got me. I don’t really wonder at all.
First of all, why would anyone care what the insurance company thinks?
A determination made internally by the insurance company as to who is at fault in a crash is as binding as duct tape on mashed potatoes. The court always has the final word.
The insurance company could have made a determination that one driver was 100 per cent at fault, and the court could make the exact opposite finding, completely exonerating that driver.
The wrongfully accused driver would have suffered insurance consequences from having an “at fault” crash on their driving record. On the court decision being pronounced, perhaps years after the crash, the insurance company would be forced to reverse all those consequences retroactively.
But what if the court decision is not 100 per cent in your favour? What if you are found to be partially to blame for the crash?
Perhaps you were trying to make it through a yellow light and an oncoming vehicle, facing that same yellow light, turned across your path, causing a crash.
The court may find you both partially to blame—the other driver for making a turn when it was unsafe to do so and you for failing to exercise due care when approaching a yellow light.
Liability could be split in any number of ways. You might be found more to blame or less to blame than the other driver. Liability could also be found to be equal.
Regardless of your degree of fault, the other driver is responsible to compensate you for your losses arising from the crash to the extent of his or her degree of fault.
Let’s take an example where $100,000 would be fair compensation for injuries you suffered in a crash. Very simply, even if you were found to be 75 per cent at fault, and the other driver was found to be only 25 per cent at fault, you would still be entitled to $25,000.
What about if the other driver has a claim as well? Let’s say that fair compensation for the other driver’s injuries is also $100,000. With you shouldering 75 per cent of the fault, his or her claim against you would be $75,000.
You might think that your $25,000 claim against the other driver, and the other driver’s $75,000 claim against you, would leave you owing the other driver the difference of $50,000.
You would be wrong. You have liability insurance. You paid good money for that insurance. You don’t have to pay the $75,000 to the other driver because your insurance company will pay it. You end up with the $25,000 free and clear.
Would the insurance company explain that to you? Don’t hold your breath.
There are many elements about car crash claims that may be very, very different from what you might expect. This area of law can be very complex.
You absolutely cannot rely on the insurance company to give you the straight goods. It’s not the insurance company’s responsibility to advise you properly about your legal rights.
In fact, their responsibility is quite the opposite. Their responsibility is to pay out as little as possible on claims. That responsibility is best accomplished if you are kept in the dark about your rights.
Most lawyers offer a free, no obligation consultation for personal injury claims. Take advantage of that to get appropriate legal advice from an experienced personal injury lawyer, so that you’ll have a clearer understanding of how the laws might apply in your case.
Published February 24, 2008 in the Kelowna Capital News